Investment Performance 2021: As Good As It Gets
by charles | Comments are closed12/01/2021
The good news is that, according to the current administration, the rich will pay for everything.
The bad news is that, according to the current administration, you’re rich.
— P. J. O’Rourke
Institutional investors delivered once-in-a-lifetime investment performance for fiscal 2021, from about 25 percent at the sleepiest public pensions to 65 percent at Washington University, St Louis.
As the late standup comedian Jackie Mason used to quip, “these are returns even the mafia can’t get.”
Take the eight Ivy endowments, for example. Their performance soared from a tepid 6.28 percent average a year ago (and ten-year 9.52 percent) to a sizzling 41.75 percent for fiscal 2021 as our chart below shows.
As of June 30, 2021, the S&P 500 tallied a twelve-month total return of 40.79 percent against the Barclays Agg ETF return of minus 0.3 percent. Even a plain vanilla 70/30 portfolio rang up about 26 percent.All things equity had a run for the ages, but how long can it last?
Private-market-heavy, risk-on endowments, foundations, and pensions enjoyed their best performance ever, thanks to eye-popping venture capital and private equity returns and good old-fashion leverage.
But here’s the caveat, if history teaches us anything, it’s that nothing lasts forever, be it empires or bull markets. Everything ends, the only question is when.
And now here’s the bad news
According to Preqin, the unrealized portion of global venture-capital portfolios skyrocketed to $1.33 trillion by March 2021, up from $803 billion in December 2019.
How are multi-asset institutional investors going to handle their asset allocations over the next few years when venture capital marks are up 80 percent, yet nothing is being realized (where’s the cash?) and investment staffs have planned for VC commitments in the 15 percent to 25 percent range.
As Sam Gallo, CIO at the University System of Maryland Foundation puts it, what do you do when an overvalued asset class takes over your book, eats up your risk budget, and threatens your ability to continue allocations across the entire portfolio? Meanwhile, every VC manager and their cousin is raising a new fund every month and if you don’t re-up, they will never let you in again.
Here’s another pickle. Let’s say a pension or endowment lays on a one percent bitcoin position that jumped to eight percent overnight. Should they rebalance back to one percent so as not to reduce their allocations to other asset classes?
Or what if bitcoin drops fifty percent as it has done at least seven times in the past, cutting that new eight percent allocation down to four percent of book?
Endowments and pensions are supposed to be long term investors, so in theory they should hold on to that bitcoin position.
But keep in mind that CIOs get bonuses by minimizing tracking error relative to their benchmarks, especially on the downside. No board likes to miss benchmarks by more than two percent a year.
What to do?
Read More »Family Offices and Chief Investment Officers, it’s complicated
by charles | Comments are closed11/09/2021
If you’re a conventional investor and things go well, that’s great.
If you’re a conventional investor and things go wrong, who could have known?
If you’re an unconventional investor and things go well, maybe you just got lucky.
If you’re an unconventional investor and things go wrong, you’re fired.
— Anonymous
Boston Consulting Group’s “Global Wealth 2021” report counts 20,600 UHNW individuals in the US with personal wealth over $100 million. As a group, they hold about $5.8 trillion in investable assets.
By 2025 BCG anticipates an additional 7,400 ultras will have scaled the $100MM heights, packing an additional $2 trillion in assets to invest.
New family office formations, we suspect, are not far behind. And that means a need for more chief investment officers. Lucky us.
But there’s a snag. Institutional style money management and entrepreneurial success are two different things and too often CIOs and ultras don’t understand each other.
A few months ago, I spoke with one of these ultras, a wildly successful first-generation entrepreneur who was thinking about hiring a money manager for his family office.
He had just made a fortune selling his retail empire and wanted to bring on an investment head to channel the cash tsunami about to wash up on his shores.
But during our call, it became clear that an endowment style, risk-focused CIO was not at all what he had in mind.
In his words, “the type of individuals you described – institutional CIOs at endowments and foundations – and the way they invest sounds really boring Charles. I want excitement. I want someone who can help me do more of what I do.”
He’s not alone. Most entrepreneurs have a hard time understanding what institutional CIOs do or why anyone would waste their time investing that way.
Diversification? What’s that?
Read More »The Endowment Model: If everyone thinks alike, who’s doing the thinking?
by charles | Comments are closed09/04/2021
Groupthink is a phenomenon that occurs when a group of well-intentioned people makes irrational or non-optimal decisions spurred by the urge to conform or the belief that dissent is impossible.
– Psychology Today
It’s hard to find an independent thinker among university endowments these days. Every board member wants to hire a Swensen clone and every CIO wants to partner with Sequoia. Group-think and safety-in-numbers has become the new endowment-model-norm.
David Swensen was one of a kind, a different thinker, a pioneer. Swensen blazed a trail thirty years ago and his first book was called Pioneering Portfolio Management for good reason. It was all new stuff. Forget public markets. Spend your time on private opportunities with less visibility and more upside.
Today that trail he blazed has become a freeway and the endowment model is one very crowded trade.
Richard Ennis, co-founder of EnnisKnupp (AON), points out that in 1994 large endowments with AUM over one billion dollars held on average less than twenty managers in their portfolio.
Twenty-five years later the average was well over one hundred, with some holding close to three-hundred funds (asset managers, commingled funds, and partnership interests, NACUBO Study 2019).
The strategy du jour on campus is mostly about appeasing the VC and PE gods, doubling down with existing managers and anteing up to the spin-offs. No one wants to be excluded from a new manager or the next flagship fund.
Proliferation drives up costs of course. With management fees of two percent of AUM plus a twenty percent carry, plus broken-deal fees and every conceivable expense charged back to the fund, the load can run six to ten percent.
As an aside, we hear that Swensen was cutting back on managers and growing more conservative in his final years. We’ll see what course Matthew Mendelsohn and staff chart going forward, but we suspect there will be headwinds.
Mr. Mendelsohn has the smarts and the will but he does not yet have Swensen’s clout.
Groupthink Happens
A recent paper in the Journal of Risk and Financial Management suggests (as do countless others) that it all begins with the boards. They set the tone and lead by example, for better or worse.
Read More »The OCIO Express: There’s No Stopping this Train
by charles | Comments are closed08/23/2021
Our latest Outsourced Chief Investment Officer (OCIO) report below features one-hundred-four firms managing industry assets of $3.27 trillion as of March 31, 2021, an increase of 15% over the prior six months.
By comparison, last year we reported 15.8% growth for the entire twelve-months ending September 30, 2020.
All things equity – public markets, private equity, venture capital — produced a year for the ages and our herd of OCIO providers kept pace with the bulls. Overall OCIO growth matched Alpha’s broad market index and slightly trailed Alpha’s moderate endowment and foundation diversified style index.
|
One-year Performance ending 3-31-21 |
Broad Market |
30.69 |
Endowment & Foundations |
35.77 |
Aggressive Asset Allocation |
46.34 |
Moderate Asset Allocation |
33.17 |
Conservative Asset Allocation |
7.71 |
MSCI ACWI |
55.31 |
S&P 500 |
56.35 |
Bloomberg Barclays US Aggregate |
0.71 |
60% MSCI ACWI / 40% Bloomberg Barclays US Agg |
31.12 |
The OCIO Story
Our friend Jon Hirtle, of Hirtle, Callaghan & Co, officially launched the OCIO service model in 1988 (with fellow Goldman Sachs vet Don Callaghan) and it’s been full steam ahead ever since.
(See Jon Hirtle’s iconoclastic guest commentary below –– and his full article OCIO My Foot! here. We welcome all points of view)
The core idea was to offer a diversified and full-discretion money management function to family offices and institutions who could no longer effectively or affordably manage the money in-house.
OCIO firms offer the proven performance of the best endowment and foundation investment managers at a reasonable price. And they can replicate the entire investment office with the process and structure to cope with the complexity of modern portfolios and mounting operational and regulatory burdens.
We’ve been charting the growth of the OCIO industry for well over a decade in our annual OCIO reports and the heirs of Hirtle, big and small, seem mostly to have flourished.
Today the industry is bifurcated, highly diverse, intensely competitive, and the nine largest providers on our OCIO list – Aon, Blackrock, Goldman Sachs, Mercer, Northern Trust, Russell, SEI, SSgA, and Willis Towers Watson – with their size and resources dominate the largest segment, corporate pensions.
These nine firms control nearly two trillion in OCIO assets or 60% of the outsourced segment, but from what we hear and see, the market for discretionary asset management services among foundations and family offices shows no sign of slowing.
Read More »Women in Finance: The Long Hard Road
by charles | Comments are closed08/12/2021
Women pursuinging positions as chief investment officers had better buckle up. It’s a long hard road.
Preqin’s Impact Report 2020, Women in Alternative Assets applauds endowments and foundations for employing women. They claim that 37.4% of senior, 48.6% mid-level, and 48.4% of junior positions at foundations, and 28.2% of senior, 42.2% mid-level, and 41.6% junior positions at endowments are held by women.
That sounds fine on the surface, but we all know the old saying about lies and statistics. Where are the women chief investment officers?
We have worked with institutional investors for years recruiting CIOs. We even wrote about The mysterious shortfall in women chief investment officers. For us, there are only two questions: who manages the money and how well do they do it?
Human Resources, legal, administration, as important as they may be, are staff functions and costs centers, but chief investment officers are executives with line responsibility. They make money – the only revenue generators for foundations and a major source of support for endowments, hospitals, charities, and pensions.
So, how are the women doing?
From the looks of things, impressively well. Our third chart below (and 2020 endowment performance report) suggests that gender has no bearing on investment performance.
Unfortunately, this news does not seem to have reached the boardrooms.
In our last newsletter – Searching for the Next Swensen: Part II – we highlighted the prodigious talent machine at the Yale investment office.
We even compiled two charts, included below, of YIO and Yale university alumni who moved on to CIO roles, and included their backgrounds and ages when they were hired as CIOs.
Notice something odd?
The men were much younger than the women when they were hired for CIO roles – ten years on average.
In other words, board members seemed more inclined to take a chance on younger men than younger women.
Other than Casey Whalen (30yrs) at Truvvo, Kimberly Sargent (39yrs) at the Packard Foundation, and Letitia Johnson (39) at Amherst, all the women were in their forties before boards took notice.
Yet all the men except for Rob Wallace (49yrs) at Stanford were in their thirties.
Granted this is a small sample, but these recruits came from Yale, every headhunter’s ground zero. They are all very good at the YIO.
I mentioned to Janet Lorin at Bloomberg News that the next Yale CIO will mostly likely have a Yale background, be on the younger side and, of course, be wicked smart, have animal ambition, and a maniacal focus. Hey, we know those women (and men).
Will the Yale University trustees show a willingness to stretch and take a chance on gender as they once did on youth? David Swensen was thirty-one years old when William Brainard ’62 PhD and provost at the time hired Swensen to manage the endowment.
Perceptions don’t change overnight, but the investment office has done an excellent job of recruiting and training superior female chief investment officers. Maybe now’s the time to bring one home.
I’m not the only one who feels this way, let’s hear it from the source.
Our goal is a level of diversity in investment management firms that reflects the diversity in the world in which we live. Genuine diversity remains elusive, giving investors like Yale and your firm an opportunity to drive change. Success will be measured by hiring, training, mentoring, and retaining women and minorities for positions on the investment teams at Yale and in your firm.
— David Swensen, October 2, 2020, Yale Investments Office
We have been in the search business for well over thirty years and here’s our take: there are plenty of talented women waiting for a CIO opportunity and our research shows they perform among the best. So go ahead, reach out, we’ll all be better for it.
— Charles Skorina
Download this newsletter as PDF
Read More »